The economic cost of an economic crisis is not always clear.
The economic crisis may be caused by an external factor, like a banking crisis, or it may be a lack of knowledge or lack of incentives, such as the closure of a factory.
What is clear, however, is that an economic downturn can result in a loss of economic activity.
The economic cost can be estimated using data from the IMF, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and other agencies.
But what about the cost of the crisis itself?
It is possible to calculate the economic cost from a macroeconomic perspective, according to a new study from the University of Bristol, University of Sussex, the University Of Oxford and the Australian National University.
The economic impact of a financial crisis The researchers used data from a database of financial institutions to estimate the economic damage caused by a financial market crisis, which can be caused when a central bank issues large amounts of money.
This includes loans and deposits to borrowers and financial institutions.
According to the study, the economic effect of a crisis was estimated at $16.6 trillion (£12.2 trillion) in the UK between 2008 and 2017.
The researchers say that, for the UK, this was a loss in economic activity of nearly 4.7% of GDP, while the overall economic impact was $1.2tn (£1.1tn).
This is a far cry from the estimates made in the 1980s and 1990s by the Bank of England, which calculated that the economic impact from the financial crisis in the US was only $12.6tn (£9.8tn).
But it is still a large figure, says Professor John Emslie, one of the study’s authors and an economist at the University College London.
“It is hard to know how much economic damage has been done by the financial sector during the crisis,” he told Al Jazeera.
“We are trying to do this by modelling the economic costs of a series of events.”
For example, the authors of the new study say the economic effects of a bank collapse can be divided into three categories: a loss from a financial crash, loss of confidence, and loss of trust.
The authors say that in the first category, a loss caused by the collapse of a large financial institution could be estimated at about $1tn.
This is equivalent to about 0.4% of UK GDP, the study says.
In the second category, the researchers calculate that the losses from the collapse and subsequent crisis in a large banking sector could be worth $2tn.
This is equivalent in terms of GDP to about 4.6% of the UK economy.
This third category is the most important because it includes a large number of financial firms and large banks in the United Kingdom, the report says.
This is about the same as the $3.2tr (£2.3tr) loss the US financial sector was estimated to have lost in 2008, but a huge chunk of the economic losses was from the US banking industry.
This has been called the ‘Big Three’, which accounted for about half of the total economic losses.
The economists then divide the economic loss into three types, which the authors say is equivalent, in terms in terms for the US economy, to about 1.5% of US GDP.
So, in this case, the US economic losses in the financial collapse in 2008 amounted to $9.2 Trillion.
This was equivalent to more than $6,000 for every person in the country, the figures suggest.
In their calculations, the economists used the data from three different banks, the Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC and Lloyds Banking Group.
In the UK the authors estimated that the total losses for each bank was between $9,400 and $13,400 per person.
This implies that the loss of $1,100 to $2,000 per person would be a very large economic cost.
In addition, the British government has been under increasing pressure to impose new regulations on financial institutions, including introducing stricter capital requirements, higher limits on lending and limiting the amount of deposits and withdrawals a bank can make.
The UK has also been hit hard by the economic fallout from the Brexit vote.
More than 90% of people living in the south-east of England voted to leave the European Union, with many blaming the financial system for the financial instability of the region.
A financial crisis can have serious effects on the wider economy, and the impact of the financial industry on the UK’s economy is also felt by the rest of the country.
“This study is one of a number of attempts to look at the economic and social consequences of a banking collapse and what it means for the rest for people across the UK,” said Professor Emslies.
Follow the BBC’s Business section on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news from the eurozone and beyond.